
The greatest strength and pitfall of social media is its reliance on constant communication, especially with celebrities and business. Users enjoy the ability to Tweet their favorite move star about their week or a company about bad customer service. The question is, what if these celebrities and companies don't want to talk to the normal consumer? This question can be looked at from both viewpoints. For the companies, the idea for making a Twitter is to open another channel of communication to the customer besides the traditional telephone/mail loopholes. Services like Twitter and Facebook are meant to give a public, easily communicable presence. If you are a company on social media, but you don't want to talk to the customer, then you are missing the entire point of the platform.
On the other hand, for celebrities or other public personas, social media doesn't need two-way communication. Most celebrity Twitters are filled with one-way communication, small tweets promoting new projects or what they just ate for lunch. The communication that occurs on social media channels usually focuses either on one-way communication with the target audience, or two-way communication with other famous personas. Unlike companies, celebrities don't have an obligation to address their fans on social media. If anything is serious enough that needs to be announced, it will usually be done more formally than a Facebook post. The corporate and singular uses of social media, no matter how big an influence either has, will always have a divide when it comes to either two-way or one-way communication.
